By Christopher Hood, Oliver James, B. Guy Peters, Colin Scott
Are public zone associations being uncovered to ever-greater oversight, audit and inspection within the identify of potency, responsibility and probability administration? Controlling smooth executive explores the long term improvement of controls over executive throughout 5 significant kingdom traditions in constructed democracies - US, Japan, variations of continental-European types, a Scandinavian case and variations of the Westminster version. A primary point of the learn is an 8 kingdom comparability of sort within the use of controls dependent in oversight, festival, mutuality and contrived randomness within the chosen domain names of the excessive forms on the middle of the country, the better schooling region and the legal area. international locations coated contain Australia, France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, the united kingdom and america.
Read or Download Controlling Modern Government: Variety, Commonality And Change PDF
Similar public affairs books
Exerpt from the monetary occasions remark & research: Europe takes on reform of the welfare nation: a brand new learn exhibits that whereas the united kingdom has remodeled its social guidelines, the remainder of Europe has been faraway from idle - `[A] stimulating new publication on eu welfare states [Welfare States stressed] means that the view of england because the in basic terms nice welfare kingdom reformer is overstated.
Will info expertise support reinvent executive? it will possibly, yet provided that it really is safely controlled. This publication presents a brand new version for administration of knowledge age reform, in response to overseas case-studies drawn from the U.S., united kingdom, mainland Europe, and constructing nations. It bargains useful information and analytical insights and should be of worth to practitioners, scholars, educators and researchers in either public management and knowledge platforms.
The future health of yank democracy eventually is determined by our willingness and talent to interact as electorate and stakeholders in our republic. govt guidelines frequently fail to advertise such collaboration. but when designed safely, they could do a lot to reinforce civic engagement. that's the primary message of Carmen Sirianni's eloquent new ebook.
- Compendium of British Office Holders
- Handbook of Organization Theory and Management: The Philosophical Approach
- Humble Analysis: The Practice of Joint Fact-Finding
- The Craft of Bureaucratic Neutrality
- Leverage for Good: An Introduction to the New Frontiers of Philanthropy and Social Investment
Additional resources for Controlling Modern Government: Variety, Commonality And Change
In any case, criminal investigation and indictment by the Public Prosecutors’ Office (PPO, Kensatsu) are an exception and the PPO is regarded as a ‘family member’ (Miuchi) of the Correction Bureau and the Ministry of Justice (legally, the PPO belongs to the MOJ but each public prosecutor is an independent public official). There are several administrative overseers of prisons beyond the Ministry of Justice. The Administrative Evaluation Bureau of the Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications inspects the prison system every 10 years.
Supranational oversight of prison systems for member states of the Council of Europe also developed in the form of the European Prison Rules, which were originally derived from the 1955 United Nations prison rules. The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms also related to prisons, with a supra-national court adjudicating human rights issues under the Convention (Council of Europe, 2001). Another set of new international standards in the field was the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of 1989 (Council of Europe, 2001), which provided for a monitoring body, the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, to visits places of detention, including police stations, army barracks and psychiatric hospitals to see how detainees are treated and, if necessary, to recommend improvements.
So how far and how widely has such a transformation in control arrangements taken place? For instance, how far has a reduction in some process rules (over hiring, pay, grading, contracts, financial virement, for example) meant an increase in other process rules (over matters like conflict of interest, transparency in reporting, discrimination, favouritism or bullying, or other potential managerial corner-cutting activities)? How far attempts at more ‘managerial’ approaches to public service provision involve a reduction in some kinds of controls and rules, and increases in others, or whether they unintentionally produce a ‘double whammy’ pattern in which new process rules and overseers are added without a substantial reduction of the old ones, is central to the theory of contemporary public management.